A his B I with ser them with Lou brought out at The Fal. live think badly of our case on 114 the facts as V. presume it is but too late to put in amy flash matter, a therefore ...
arking H. King to supply the only time possible for me this week is tomorrow (Friday) afternoon at 4.0 o'clock Failing that Cater Wondary at 3.30 would suit us Evidence to show how undeniable person the appellant was 20/11/17 ? Wil with So anane v Me Burchell ... Know dacy shows, retimney the Wh to war 13/1/44 × Mr. Frisley Hiday at 4.30 in 211. Love loom H. CB. 13/11 her Costines gantote S
This Bush and I saw Hot Burchell on morder, afternoon ry and dissemord the meth I need not write a minute of any leve his as the cohays" of the letter & mear a L which I have sout her Burchell toden sufficiently indicat the twis of our compunce. his Buschell was not at all histused I do with the (extremely inconvenient) vicios of her upjohn - hand not brafed him and affeand to share that fair Case CAR for the validity of the It thong HSA19/1/g I wish he over was X an word A&C 20-11 See 6619 76. 8. Sindle.
My fears were lather directed to possible comment than to a rion gloring the appeal, which Chieth depends upon the validit's 9th Air.. The PC Would only receive fresk Evidence in exceptional cites, &ifchiectly mercial to the issue. We could hardly claim that the appellants Character was, luaterial to @ thralidity Attellever illiver or © if valid, the question whether Hiplovisions were property Comfilied With. It is the old story of doing a right thing in the Wrong way. Holtz 20/11/19 Jie S. Fiddes
In 1917 H. Kong legislated taking power to deport British subjects who acted as solitots tire to AL o tired up litigation.
A
his B
I with ser
them with
Lou
brought out at
The Fal.
live
think badly of our case on
114
the factsas
V. presume it is
but
too late to put in
amy
flash matter, a
therefore
ኦ።
arking H. King
to supply
the only time possible for me
this week is tomorrow (Friday)
fternoon at 4.0. aclock
Failing that
~
Cater
Wondary at 3. 30 would
suit us
Evidence to show how undeniable
person the appellant was
20/11/17
?
Wil
with
So
anane v
Me
Burchell
Сев
هنا
Know
dacy shows, retimney
the Wh to war
13/1/44
X
× Mr. Frisley
Hiday at 4.30 in
211.
Love loom H. CB. 13/11
her Costines
gantote
S
This Bush and I saw Hot Burchell
on morder, afternoon ry and dissemord
the meth
I need not write a minute of any leve his
as the cohays" of the letter & mear a
L
which I have sout her Burchell
toden sufficiently indicat the
twis of our compunce.
his Buschell was not at all histused
I do with the (extremely inconvenient)
vicios of her upjohn
-
hand not brafed him and
affeand to share
that
fair
Case CAR
for the validity of the It thong
بالله
HSA 19/1/g
I wish he
over was
X
an word
A&C
20-11
See 6619 76.
8. Sindle.
My fears were lather directed to possible comment than to a rion gloring the appeal, which Chieth depends upon the validit's 9th Air..
The PC Would only receive fresk Evidence in exceptional cites, &ifchiectly mercial to the issue.
We could hardly claim that the appellants Character was, luaterial to @ thralidity
Attellever
illiver or © if valid, the question whether Hiplovisions were property Comfilied With.
It is the old story of doing a right thing in the Wrong way. Holtz 20/11/19
Jie S. Fiddes
In 1917
H. Kong legislated taking power to deport British subjects who acted as
solicitots tire to
AL
o tired up litigation.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.